#16
|
||||
|
||||
Свечи, кстати, упомянуты во всех рекомендациях. Что касается "licensed versus unlicensed", то позиция:
The term ‘unlicensed medicine’ is normally applied to those medicines which do not have a UK Marketing Authorization (MA), formerly a Product Licence (PL), granted by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) or European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). The term unlicensed may also be applied to licensed medicines when they are used for unlicensed applications, so-called ‘off label’ prescribing. For good clinical reasons the use of unlicensed medicines is widespread in hospitals. It is important that such use continues, since if this practice were to be curtailed, the treatment of many patients would be impeded. It is important however that all prescribers and pharmacists should be aware of the associated medico-legal implications of such practice. Medicines are also commonly used for non-licensed indications (off-label). Prescribers should take steps to ensure they are aware when they are using a medicine for an unlicensed indication. Pharmacists are available to assist in this respect, and where such prescribing is evident, will bring this to the attention of the prescriber........ |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
The term ‘unlicensed medicine’ is normally applied to those medicines which do not have a UK Marketing Authorization (MA), formerly a Product Licence (PL), granted by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) or European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). ----но это не каждый русскоязычный читатель знает,что есть такая позиция (по крайней мере до сегодняшнего дня),поэтому unlicensed могут у некоторых вызвать сомнения,особенно при отсутсвии собственного опыта применения......А за глицериновые свечи действительно обидно....,тем более, что даже в статье с 2-х лет рекомендуют свечи(единственные ,указанные в статье) бисакодил
|