|
#13
03.11.2017, 19:07
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ôèçè÷åñêàÿ àêòèâíîñòü (5 äíåé â íåäåëþ ïî 25 ìèíóò) ó æåëåçîäåôèöèòíûõ æåíùèí çàìåäëÿåò êîððåêöèþ ôåððèòèíà ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ òåìè, êòî íå íàãðóæàåò ñåáÿ òàêîâûìè óïðàæíåíèÿìè: ÷åðåç 8 íåäåëü ïðèåìà 42 ìã æåëåçà â äåíü ôåððèòèí ó ïåðâûõ áûë â ïîëòîðà ðàçà íèæå (32 ïðîòèâ 48 ìêã/ë), ïîäðîáíåå:
72 iron-depleted, nonanemic Chinese women [serum ferritin (sFer) <25 μg/L and hemoglobin >110 g/L] were included in an 8-wk, partially blinded, randomized controlled trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design including iron supplements (42 mg elemental Fe/d) or placebo and aerobic training (five 25-min sessions/wk at 75-85% of maximum heart rate) or no training. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the relation between supplement type, training, and changes in iron status over time, measured by sFer, hemoglobin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), and estimated total body iron.Results: After treatment, both the iron-supplemented trained and untrained groups showed significantly improved sFer, sTfR, and body iron values compared with either of the placebo groups. Similarly, trained participants had significantly higher aerobic fitness measures than untrained participants. Training modified the sFer response to supplementation (training by supplement interaction, P = 0.07), with the iron-supplemented trained group having significantly lower sFer than the iron-supplemented untrained group at week 8 (mean ± SD: 31.8 ± 13.5 and 47.6 ± 15.7 μg/L, respectively; P = 0.042), whereas there was no significant difference between the placebo trained and untrained groups (21.3 ± 12.2 and 20.3 ± 7.0 μg/L, respectively; P = 1.00). --- Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Nov 1. Efficacy of iron supplementation may be misinterpreted using conventional measures of iron status in iron-depleted, nonanemic women undergoing aerobic exercise training. |
|
|
Äðåâîâèäíûé âèä